Increased Diversity equals less Freedom

August 21, 2009 by · Leave a Comment 

It is AHS position that rampant diversity creates a hostile environment that severely restricts the freedom of its citizenry. Some of America’s cities are on the verge or have already reached the breaking point of either chaos or a high amount of laws to control the potential for chaos within those cities.

Share This Post

National Socialism

August 20, 2009 by · Leave a Comment 

AHS believes that America is embarking on a period of national socialism. We will spend up to a generation at this political paradigm before we disenengrate into different soverign regions.

Where have we heard the term national socialism? Well, it was made popular by Adolf Hitler as leader of the NAZIs (National Socialist Workers Party). However, 20th century German National Socialism will be different  than 21st century American National Socialism.

Socialism on its own can be basically be described as a statism that involves an extreme amount of regulation and the withering of private rights and property. National Socialism also has a high degree of centralization; however, the state will be hyper-nationalistic.

Share This Post

Ayn Rand & Abortion pt. 2

March 15, 2009 by · Leave a Comment 

Ayn Rand believed that an embryo is equal to nail clippings or hair clippings. She believed that until the fetus is capable of surviving outside the womb it is not to be considered a human. So, technically until the child reaches the middle of the second trimester (twenty-three weeks) it is not to be considered a human and the rights that are conferred upon by its nation do not apply to it.
She believed until that juncture abortion should not be regulated.
Before the twenty-third week, it is a personal matter and not a legislative one.
 
Moreover, she cited economic reasons as justifications for abortion. Which leads one to ponder her beliefs on eugenics.
 
AHS response:

Ayn Rand is essentially correct. Abortion is a personal matter. The federal government should have no jurisdiction on that subject. However, the state governments are well within their rights to regulate abortion. However, Ayn Rand denigrates those that would state that life starts at conception for placing the life marker at the very beginning of the gestational period. On the other hand, Ayn Rand has chosen to place the life’s demarcation at the twenty-third week (and most likely in her time the thirtieth week).

Share This Post

Ayn Rand & God pt.1

March 15, 2009 by · Leave a Comment 

AHS will periodically do a brief critical analysis of Ayn Rand’s views on particular topics she devoted her time to in her life. She was without a doubt one of the great thinkers of our time. The first installments of this series will go over the generalities of her view on abortion and God. This will be written as a lay response to a very intricate and involved Objectivist philosophy that incorporates realism and the rejection of metaphysics.

 

Share This Post

Androgyne

February 7, 2009 by · Leave a Comment 

Coming soon to theaters: Androgyne

It is the year 2032. America has no designations as man or woman. Sister or brother. Male or Female. Father or Mother.  To be continued…

Share This Post

Capitalism without Morals

January 27, 2009 by · Leave a Comment 

AHS supports a free market economy and a laissez-faire goverment. However, all things have limits and must have limits if we are to maintain our country. American citizens should be basically entitled to the free market within the American borders. Once the citizens start to do business outside of the borders of this country, regulatory action must be enacted to ensure national security. Non-citizens should not be entitled to the same degree of free market business that citizens are entitled to in America.

Share This Post

Presidential Rankings

December 28, 2008 by · Leave a Comment 

Below is a compiliation of the United States Presidents. They have been ranked based on presidential achievements, leadership qualities, failures and faults. Presidents were heavily scored based on their adherence to the constitution. Secondarily, the level of character and morality that they exhibited in their lives also was a notable factor in ranking the presidents.

Share This Post

The Poor: Does Social Welfare Create and Maintain an Underclass?

December 21, 2008 by · Leave a Comment 

The American practice of the separation of state and religion is needed badly concerning the subject of federally subsidized welfare. We are predominantly a Christian nation. Meaning most Americans describe themselves as Christians. Is it possible that the manner that this religion is practiced has wrought an economic neck weight? Jesus taught not that governments should take from citizens to give to other citizens. Rather, those individuals should take it upon themselves to give what they can to the needy. Taking care of the needy is an individual responsibility. Only through person to person social interaction can welfare operate without any negative consequences.

Share This Post

Native Americans owe Blacks reparations!

December 18, 2008 by · Leave a Comment 

Throughout schools in this nation, the government educational apparatus (public schools) are giving an incomplete history of American slavery. They would have you believe that this evil institution was based solely on race and evilness. Yes, those were components that drove the desire to enslave others. However, it was not the only reason…

 

Generally, the greatest factors that allowed slavery to persist for centuries were economical and cultural. Slavery could not have persisted if the people that were doing the exploiting and the people that were being exploited were not use to this kind of arrangement. Many European and African countries had long been involved in slave trading before 1500 A.D. This generally involved Europeans enslaving other European societies and Africans and Muslim Arabs involved in shipping and trading Africans across the continent and to other continents.  

Share This Post

Affirmative Action President?

November 10, 2008 by · Leave a Comment 

With the recent passing of our American elections, many questions have been asked and answered insufficiently from our president-elect Barrack Obama. Is his rise to power a sign of a progression in race relations? Or rather, is it a sign of America’s decline as a country?

Let’s take a journey back to 2004… when the Democrat party were licking their wounds from John Kerry’s and the Congress’ losses. Who would have even considered in 2004 that the most socialist minded candidate since Franklin Delano Roosevelt could have won the presidency in 2008. Along with Barack’s personal views is his nefarious associations with the likes of Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid Muhammad, and Rezko.

Share This Post

Next Page »